3,679
edits
Project:Content policy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== Preserving community informational security == | == Preserving community informational security == | ||
{{Shortcut|P:OPSEC}} | {{Shortcut|P:OPSEC}} | ||
Access to information varies based on both the community's genre and on the position a person has in it. A competitive community | Access to information varies based on both the community's genre and on the position a person has in it. A competitive community may restrict access to tactics, future activities, or training to only those in the relevant teams. A community that hosts servers may restrict access to disciplinary documents because it has personally identifiable information, may make the community look poorly as it'll be taken out of context, or it is restricted to maintain trust in the community's discretion in handling sensitive matters. | ||
'''No information regarding a community may be added ''<u>anywhere on this project</u>'' that is not available to someone with <u>general membership</u> in the relevant community'''. "General membership" is defined as access to information that does not require appointment to a named position or user group via any method. Access to information that ''does'' require appointment is considered to be outside the scope of "general membership". If such information is discovered or reported, [[Project:Administrators|administrators]] may remove it and perform revision deletion to remove it from page history. | |||
Conversely, community leaders may not petition the Online Community Wiki to remove information that they do not wish to be displayed. If the information is in line with our content policies and relevant laws, unless there is a consensus amongst editors to remove it, it may remain. Community leaders are similarly not able to circumvent this policy by retroactively concealing information that was once available to the general member base; if it was ever available to the member base, it may remain. | |||
== Verifiability == | == Verifiability == | ||
| Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
The following situations, if they apply, ''do'' require the presence of a citation to a '''source that is reliable for the statement(s) it is supporting''' in order to maintain inclusion. Otherwise, editors may remove it, and it may not be restored until it is cited. If the information cannot be cited, it is inappropriate for inclusion on this project. | The following situations, if they apply, ''do'' require the presence of a citation to a '''source that is reliable for the statement(s) it is supporting''' in order to maintain inclusion. Otherwise, editors may remove it, and it may not be restored until it is cited. If the information cannot be cited, it is inappropriate for inclusion on this project. | ||
# Content that describes actions or behavior that characterizes a ''specific person'' in a negative light. | # Content that describes actions or behavior that characterizes a ''specific person'' in a negative light. | ||
# Extraordinary claims regarding | # Extraordinary claims regarding a community's accomplishments or that of it's participants. | ||
# Any claim made within an article that is challenged by an autoconfirmed editor. | # Any claim made within an article that is challenged by an autoconfirmed editor. | ||
## If an editor wishes to invoke this, it must be done on the talk page of the article with an explicit statement challenging the claim and the claim provided verbatim. | ## If an editor wishes to invoke this, it must be done on the talk page of the article with an explicit statement challenging the claim and the claim provided verbatim. | ||
#Any content which serves to show that the community meets the [[Project:Inclusion criteria|inclusion criteria]]. | #Any content which serves to show that the community meets the [[Project:Inclusion criteria|inclusion criteria]]. | ||