3,679
edits
Project:Content policy: Difference between revisions
m
→Presumption of staff integrity: typo
(adjust opsec policy, add sub-policy to verifiability) |
m (→Presumption of staff integrity: typo) |
||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
** In this case, the written material is to be utilized. | ** In this case, the written material is to be utilized. | ||
* Any other staff member contradicts them. | * Any other staff member contradicts them. | ||
** In this case, whichever staff member of the highest ''relevant''<ref>A moderator for the Discord server discussing Discord policy is ''presumed'' to be more authoritative than an administrator for a ''Garry's Mod'' server commenting on the same policy. This | ** In this case, whichever staff member of the highest ''relevant''<ref>A moderator for the Discord server discussing Discord policy is ''presumed'' to be more authoritative than an administrator for a ''Garry's Mod'' server commenting on the same policy. This is due to the moderator's immediate ''relevance'' to the Discord server.</ref> "rank" or "tier" is to be utilized. | ||
** If a ''current'' staff member contradicts a statement made in the past by a ''former'' staff member, the ''current'' staff member is to be utilized. | ** If a ''current'' staff member contradicts a statement made in the past by a ''former'' staff member, the ''current'' staff member is to be utilized. | ||
** If there is no clear hierarchy among the active contradictory staff members, and there is no written material discussing the subject, Online Communipedia should document the contradiction rather than make a statement 1 way or the other. | ** If there is no clear hierarchy among the active contradictory staff members, and there is no written material discussing the subject, Online Communipedia should document the contradiction rather than make a statement 1 way or the other. | ||