3,679
edits
Project:Content policy: Difference between revisions
m
→Synthesis: typo
(→Private evidence: add content) |
m (→Synthesis: typo) |
||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
{{Shortcut|P:SYNTH}}It is often necessary to synthesize information, or take information from multiple sources and draw a conclusion from it in the project's voice, in order to describe a community. This is most common when writing about a community's rank structure, since it is rarely spelled out. Sourcing will probably not exist that outright proves synthesis, which is acceptable; but sourcing must still be provided for the facts being used within the synthesis. | {{Shortcut|P:SYNTH}}It is often necessary to synthesize information, or take information from multiple sources and draw a conclusion from it in the project's voice, in order to describe a community. This is most common when writing about a community's rank structure, since it is rarely spelled out. Sourcing will probably not exist that outright proves synthesis, which is acceptable; but sourcing must still be provided for the facts being used within the synthesis. | ||
Synthesis must ''never'' be performed when writing about a community's history or when writing about particular events that happened within it. Such content must remain | Synthesis must ''never'' be performed when writing about a community's history or when writing about particular events that happened within it. Such content must remain strictly neutral, only present what sourcing states, and only present the facts in the voice of whatever the source is. | ||
=== Media and verifiability === | === Media and verifiability === | ||